Tag Archive for Twitter

Don’t be evil? Is Google flexing its muscle, or just manipulating the marketplace?

Google search engines are the new high street marketplace

Back in June when the online community was talking about Google+ and what it would mean to the world of search engine management, my take on the situation was, that Google couldn’t afford another failure, especially after the flop that was Google Buzz, (and you wouldn’t be blamed for thinking, Google what?)- They had to make it work.

I have previously predicted that despite Google’s supposed “fair” methods of working out which order pages appear in SERPs (Search Engine Results Pages), Google would have to start prioritising signals from Google+, forcing people within the marketing and online communities to embrace the social network whether they liked it or not.

Low and behold, in early January 2012, Google announced the “Search Your World” update, which prioritises search results based on content that you and your network of Google Plus connections have “+1’d”. This is yet another step to empowering the already super popular (please read – well funded, large marketing budget) brands while pushing down the smaller brands and one-man-band type websites, placing yet another hurdle to overcome when looking to achieve success in the online world. I liken this move by the search giant to the death of the local village high street, caused by the rise of giant supermarkets such as Tesco, Asda and Sainsbury’s.

When Google Plus was launched, they did a very good job of creating an air of exclusivity about it, only allowing a certain number of people to join at a time. This left people clambering for an invite and see what all the fuss was about. Within weeks of the release of Plus+, Google was boasting join-ups in excess of 64 million.

What Google haven’t been so forthcoming with is numbers of returning visitors and active users after sign up. I know that after the initial excitement (followed by extreme disappointment) many of the people who signed up, myself included, have never returned to their profile, choosing to continue with their Facebook and Twitter profiles which are already heavily populated with their friends, photos and other key information. So it comes so no surprise to me that Google launched their “Search Plus Update”.

However this still leaves me wondering how successful Google Plus+ will actually be? Like me, SEO and marketing professionals will suddenly start taking an unnatural interest in Plus+ again, fearing the impact on their careers. But will this bear any weight on the average, search algorithm oblivious Google user who frankly doesn’t know or care what their friends think and simply wants to surf the net. If people want to share content with their friends, surely they will continue to publish links on the Facebook walls and Twitter feeds?

It is only natural that the other major social network players are nervous – no doubt their backsides are going like a rabbit’s nose attempting to guess at Google’s next strategic move. So when I read in The Guardian that developers from Myspace, Twitter and Facebook have joined forces to create a browser add-on called ‘Don’t be evil’ not only were my suspicions confirmed, but I also found myself in agreement with their cause.  It would be interesting to see the number of people who install this browser add-on, but again this will most likely depend in the number of people who actually understand anything about the whole search situation, or even care. For people who are none the wiser they probably won’t even notice their SERPs are being weighed up by this, in the same way they don’t understand the hundreds of other intricacies that feed into why search engines present you with the results they do. Therefore I suspect that Google are banking on getting away with making such changes with minimal protest.

So where does that leave people within the translation services sector?  So many freelance linguists rely heavily on Google search results and online profile for the generation of revenue and work, in a highly competitive market. When the online marketplace rules are being changed so frequently, in order to manipulate the results, I have to stress that it is so important that individuals begin to pay more attention to announcements from Google and ask – what does this mean for my business? To finish with the analogy of the high street I used earlier, website owners need to treat their websites like their own shop floor, and constantly adapt it depending on customer feedback, new technology, and to negotiate the state of flux search engines operate in. This is not a passing trend, and many millions of people are already three or four steps behind.

We are now on Facebook

Howdy Translation Blog readers,

Facebook like and dislike button

Disliking the fact our Facebook page has very few 'Likes' - Fancy helping us out?

This is a quick post to say that I have finally got round to setting up a page on Facebook. We don’t have many ‘likes’ at the moment – which I certainly don’t ‘like’!

Therefore I am putting out a shameless plug to ask that if you have enjoyed reading any of the posts on Translation Blog and would like to see updates in your news feed, that you ‘like’ our page either from your personal account or from your own blog/business page if you have one.

You can visit our page at http://www.facebook.com/pages/Translation-Blog/165375063543657. If you don’t want to follow us on Facebook you can always follow us on Twitter, http://twitter.com/#!/translate_blog.

We are sure that you will find the future posts interesting and informative; and if you feel moved to do so you can even contract us about submitting your very own guest post; just visit the Guest Post page to view our posting guidelines.

Does text speak spell the end of the English language?

Text Abbreviations

R u down wiv txt speak?

It’s a subject I have touched upon in previous posts, but since reading an article specifically aimed at how text speak has the potential to threaten the English language as we know it, I thought this topic needed a little more exploration.

There are many scenarios in which text speak can cause embarrassment and numerous websites aimed at highlighting such misfortune. One example that came into my inbox recently was a lady mistaking LOL to mean ‘lots of love’ when most people read this as ‘laugh out loud’; probably not appropriate when announcing the death of a relative, but let us not forget why text speak exists and why it is increasingly popular amongst the younger generations.

Back in the day text messages were limited to 160 characters (with Twitter being a more modern day example, limited to a mere 140) and, unless lucky enough to have parents that would subsidise a contract phone, under 18s were bound to the restrictions of pay as you go phones, which don’t always offer the same ‘unlimited text’ allowances. Therefore cramming every last morsel of information in to just 160 characters is only going to be achieved by the severest of abbreviations, some of which are open to interpretation (such as LOL) and others could warrant a translation service.  As we absorb more information as an adolescent this could explain why, as we grow older, such habits die hard.

Linguistic experts fear that these habits can harm our academic development but according to research carried out by Manchester Metropolitan and Lancaster Universities, texting and Twitter are not the first time we have got our knickers in a twist about preserving the English language. The Edwardians’ worried that the informal tones of postcards would change the way people communicated, which undoubtedly they did but formal communication still exists today and there is nothing to suggest that it will not continue to do so for the foreseeable future.